Rate Cuts, Inflation, and Mortgages: A Balancing Act of Economic Forces

/0 Comments/in , /by

Look closely at bond yields after next week’s Bank of Canada rate announcement; they’re the unsung GPS guiding fixed-rate mortgages. As Canadians prepare for potential rate cuts, the financial world shifts beneath their feet, yet few understand how these cuts ripple through the broader economy. With two-thirds of economists predicting a 50-basis-point chop in the Bank of Canada’s rates, it’s time we explored the deeper implications.

Bond yields act as a canary in the coal mine for mortgage shoppers. Fixed mortgage rates are tethered to them like a ship to its anchor. When yields fall, mortgage rates tend to follow, but as any seasoned observer knows, the bond market is not a passive reactor—it anticipates. The mere whisper of rate cuts sends ripples through the market, sparking a dance between inflation, yields, and mortgage rates.

At first glance, it’s tempting to assume bond yields will simply drop along with rates. However, markets often bake in expectations before the fact, betting that looser monetary policy will heat up the economy, dragging inflation with it. This counterintuitive bounce means yields, and therefore mortgage rates, might bottom out before eventually rising. It’s a waiting game, not for the faint of heart.

Right now, inflation is playing the role of the reluctant guest, refusing to rise to the occasion. The Bank of Canada, seeing this, might be cutting rates to avoid an economic spiral, but therein lies the rub—cut too much, and we might soon be staring down the barrel of overheated inflation. Bond traders, however, are calling the Bank’s bluff. They’re expecting 100 basis points of cuts by January, slicing the overnight rate back to 3.25%, the theoretical “neutral” zone where the economy neither speeds up nor slows down. Yet, theory is one thing; reality is another.

When the overnight rate hovers between 2.25% and 3.25%, it’s supposed to create a Goldilocks moment—just right for economic growth. But here’s the kicker: central bankers rarely get it just right. Often, they slash too deeply, worried inflation will drag the economy into a deflationary mire. So, when that neutral 2.75% midpoint comes into view, the Bank of Canada may take a breather, delaying further cuts.

And what about those bond yields? They will eventually reach their own rock bottom, with a potential political wildcard thrown into the mix. If Trump reclaims the U.S. presidency this November, his fiscal policies could inject a jolt into U.S. inflation, sending ripples across the border to Canada. Inflation doesn’t need a passport, after all.

Here’s where the rubber meets the road: a 50-basis-point rate cut will have a profound impact on floating-rate borrowers. With the average Canadian mortgage sitting at roughly $300,000, many will find themselves pocketing an extra $80 to $120 monthly. It’s not just a windfall; it’s a potential catalyst for more spending. And as every economist knows, spending begets more spending. Those extra dollars might start circulating through the economy, whether on paying down debt, covering rising costs of essentials, or indulging in discretionary purchases. That surge in consumer spending could, ironically, push inflation higher—precisely what the Bank of Canada is trying to avoid.

Additionally, with lower rates, homebuyers will find themselves in a psychological tug-of-war. The moment rates drop, there’s a rush to get in before prices rise again. We’ve been here before—commentators have sung this tune since June, when the first cuts rolled out. The reality is that lower rates don’t just lower monthly payments; they make mortgages more accessible, especially if the government’s minimum qualifying rate follows suit. Still, it’s a psychological game as much as an economic one.

Let’s zoom out and examine how a 50-basis-point cut reshapes the mortgage landscape. A new floating-rate mortgage will see interest rates fall from 5.60% to 5.10%, a seemingly modest drop, but one that offers a tangible benefit. It cuts monthly payments by about $30 per $100,000 borrowed. More crucially, it lowers the income required to qualify for such a mortgage. For a $500,000 mortgage, a well-qualified borrower would need about $5,000 less in annual income. The dream of homeownership moves a step closer for many Canadians.

However, there are always consequences in the world of monetary policy. As the loonie—the ever-sensitive Canadian dollar—responds to this interest rate dance, we may see it drop further, making everything from vacations to imported goods more expensive. It’s a potential double-edged sword: while consumers get a break on mortgage payments, they pay more for just about everything else.

On the other hand, inflation may very well remain dormant. But if it creeps back up in the coming months, there will undoubtedly be rumblings that the Bank of Canada overcorrected. Critics are already forming ranks, with some arguing that the central bank’s cuts may have gone too far. If inflation stays within a manageable range, the rate-cutting cycle could stall, leaving the economy in a delicate balance between low growth and steady inflation.

This is not just theory, though. Real estate sales are already ticking up slightly, and sellers are listing properties at a pace we haven’t seen in two years. The uptick in supply is, for now, a welcome relief for buyers starved of choice. But with new inventory flowing in, especially in places like Toronto’s condo market, prices are under pressure. Toronto’s condo benchmark price took a 1.3% hit from August to September alone, the sharpest drop since February. Single-detached homes, though more insulated, aren’t immune to these shifts.

As we look toward the months ahead, all eyes remain on interest rates and inventory levels. For now, the rate cuts are a double-edged sword, offering relief to some while casting doubt over long-term economic stability. One thing is certain: the mortgage and housing markets remain inextricably tied to bond yields and the whims of central banks.

– Kai T.

A New Canadian Solution to the Housing Crisis: Unlocking Value and Building Community

/0 Comments/in /by

In a nation grappling with a historic housing shortage, the Canadian government, led by Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, has introduced a bold new strategy. Starting January 15, 2025, Canadians will be eligible to refinance their mortgages up to 90% of their home’s improved value to fund the construction of secondary suites. This move seeks to address two issues simultaneously: helping homeowners manage rising mortgage costs while increasing the rental stock in high-demand areas. Yet, beyond these clear objectives, this new initiative reflects a wider trend—a recognition that Canada’s housing solutions must embrace adaptability and community-centric approaches.

Freeland’s announcement comes as no surprise to those who have been closely watching Ottawa’s efforts to stabilize the housing market. For years, rising property prices and high borrowing costs have kept homeownership out of reach for many. In recent times, mortgage rule adjustments have raised caps on default insurance and extended amortization periods to ease pressures on borrowers. But the decision to facilitate secondary suites goes one step further. It’s not just about making ownership more affordable; it’s about transforming our existing housing stock into multi-unit living arrangements that better serve both owners and tenants.

Under this new policy, homeowners can secure refinancing at a 90% loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, contingent on the total property value not exceeding $2 million. While some may raise their eyebrows at that figure, it becomes clear that the government aims to include as many Canadians as possible in this program—allowing not only modest homeowners but also those with more substantial assets to contribute to the rental market. Further, with a maximum amortization period of 30 years, borrowers can extend their repayment terms, making this investment in secondary suites more financially palatable. This setup recognizes the reality that housing investments are long-term ventures, and affordability is not solely about the upfront costs but also about the ongoing payments.

However, this isn’t merely an invitation to build willy-nilly. The regulations stipulate that homeowners can add up to four units on their property, and each unit must be fully self-contained, with its own living facilities, kitchen, and bathroom. The adherence to municipal zoning requirements underscores the need for these suites to function as independent, livable spaces. By mandating that these units remain long-term rentals, not short-term accommodations, the government is making a decisive stand. This is not about feeding the voracious appetite of the short-term rental market, as seen with platforms like Airbnb, which some critics argue have exacerbated housing shortages by diverting units from potential tenants to tourists. Instead, this initiative focuses on fostering long-term rental availability, aiming to bring stability to an otherwise volatile rental landscape.

While the focus on secondary suites is compelling, Freeland’s announcement also highlighted another critical aspect of the housing crisis: vacant land. It’s an open secret that in many Canadian cities, underutilized or vacant parcels of land sit idle, owned by individuals or corporations with no immediate plans for development. In response, the government has launched consultations on implementing taxes on vacant land. Provinces, territories, and municipalities are encouraged to provide feedback on how such taxes could be structured to incentivize land development. This concept isn’t entirely new—other countries, including Australia and the United States, have grappled with similar issues and have utilized vacancy taxes as a potential solution. Here, the idea is to push landowners to make productive use of their property, which ideally means more homes and fewer neglected lots in neighborhoods already starved for housing.

The government’s strategy also involves the Canada Public Land Bank, an initiative that has now expanded to 70 underused federal properties across the country. This land is earmarked for housing developments, ideally leading to more affordable housing options in cities struggling with skyrocketing prices. Such moves reflect a fundamental acknowledgment that there isn’t a single, silver-bullet solution to Canada’s housing crisis. It’s a multi-faceted problem, requiring a myriad of approaches, from incentivizing individual homeowners to encouraging broader land development.

Yet, as with all government initiatives, questions abound. Will the secondary suite refinancing program truly benefit middle-class Canadians? It’s a well-meaning plan, but it depends on the financial capacity of individual homeowners to take on further debt to fund these projects. Moreover, there is a risk that larger players in the real estate market—those with deeper pockets and access to substantial refinancing—might co-opt the program, edging out the very homeowners it seeks to assist.

As for the vacant land tax, it’s a solid idea in theory. However, without careful implementation, such a tax could have unintended consequences. Some landowners may choose to pass these costs onto consumers, potentially driving up prices in an already costly housing market. And there’s the question of how such taxes will be enforced at the municipal level, where resources and enforcement capabilities vary widely.

The use of federal land is perhaps the most straightforward of these proposals. Public land converted into housing is, quite simply, public good, and few could argue against it. But the government’s track record with large-scale development projects has been mixed, and one wonders if these new plans will translate into tangible housing options within a reasonable timeframe.

In sum, Freeland’s announcement is a timely reminder that Canada’s housing crisis is a complex web, woven together by issues of affordability, availability, and land use. The government’s new plan is a promising start. If executed well, it could encourage more Canadians to take an active role in alleviating the housing shortage while offering financial relief to homeowners. Yet, as always, the devil is in the details, and only time will tell whether these measures will pave the way to a more balanced housing market.

The Canadian government has taken the first step. Now, it’s up to Canadians to watch closely, engage thoughtfully, and ensure these plans translate into meaningful change.

– Kai T.

Toronto House Flipping in 2024: Market Cooldown, Anti-Flipping Rules, and Investor Adaptations

/0 Comments/in /by

In October 2024, house flipping in Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area is a tale of high profits, market shifts, and new regulatory hurdles. Once an investment darling, the practice now faces the stiff headwinds of a cooling market and a set of anti-flipping measures that aim to curb speculative buying. Yet, despite these changes, seasoned flippers are finding ways to adapt, albeit with a touch more caution and a careful eye on emerging trends.

The Greater Toronto Area’s real estate market is showing signs of cooling. September 2024 saw the average home price in the GTA dip 1.1% year-over-year to $1,107,291. This small shift reflects a broader slowdown, particularly when considering that the GTA once rode a relentless wave of price increases. For flippers, this decline can mean slimmer profit margins and a slightly riskier investment landscape. Even so, market volatility has not deterred everyone. In mid-September, some areas still experienced intense bidding wars, with detached homes going for 50-65% over asking prices. These sporadic price surges signal that buyers’ appetite, while tempered, hasn’t disappeared entirely.

Yet, the market’s shifting sands have driven many would-be flippers to rethink their approach. The landscape has evolved beyond the standard fixer-upper flip. Today, buyers are increasingly eyeing larger properties outside downtown cores, moving from compact urban condos to roomier townhomes, semi-detached, and detached homes in the suburbs. Young families, once willing to cram into tiny high-rises, now seek space to stretch out, shifting demand toward the fringes of the GTA. House flippers, recognizing this trend, are adapting their strategies. The days of flipping urban condos may be fading, with suburban properties taking center stage in the flipping game.

One might think these adjustments are enough, but enter the anti-flipping measures—rules aimed squarely at cooling the GTA’s overheated segments and stabilizing home prices. These measures impose steep taxes on homes sold within a year of purchase, throwing a wrench into the fast-turnaround flips of yesterday. Investors now face a dilemma: either hold onto properties for longer or find creative ways to circumvent these tax burdens. As a result, the playbook is shifting. Some are doubling down on substantial renovations to justify higher sale prices, distancing themselves from the “flip-and-forget” model. Others are focusing on longer-term projects or even withdrawing from the market, delaying sales to avoid the tax hit. While this may reduce short-term market supply, it also highlights how speculative flipping is becoming less viable for the average investor.

For those still in the game, high-interest rates and regulatory challenges loom large. The cost of borrowing has surged, with many flippers now facing steep mortgage stress tests that curb their access to capital. Financing options are increasingly expensive, limiting the pool of potential players. The experienced flippers who remain, however, know how to leverage private lenders and other sources of funding. Despite the cost, private lenders offer more flexibility, making it possible to finance a flip without the red tape of traditional mortgages. But even these investors must navigate the fine line between a calculated risk and a reckless gamble. After all, when financing at 10-15% interest rates, timing is everything, and delays can mean the difference between profit and loss.

And while anti-flipping measures try to stabilize the market, the broader economic environment is causing its own tremors. Toronto’s high-end market has been remarkably resilient, leading some investors to shift their focus from modest flips to luxury new builds. These custom builds cater to affluent buyers who can weather the economic fluctuations and pay premium prices. New construction allows investors to sidestep the unpredictability of fixer-uppers and instead create a product for an ever-present demand at the city’s highest price points. But for the ordinary buyer or the young family hoping to buy their first home, this trend signals more troubling news. Rising prices and inflated values further concentrate wealth among the few, making home ownership an increasingly exclusive club.

Amid these challenges, the GTA’s market segmentation has become glaring. Some neighborhoods experience fierce competition, with properties snatched up for well above asking. Other areas, however, face tepid demand, leaving flippers grappling with the risks of a softer market. It’s a patchwork landscape requiring astute market research and a keen understanding of neighborhood-specific dynamics. In the past, Toronto flippers could count on relentless price appreciation across the board. Now, they must be more strategic, carefully choosing properties in areas likely to weather the market’s volatility.

For the flippers that remain, the new strategy boils down to adaptability and foresight. As regulatory pressures, financing challenges, and market conditions converge, these investors must assess not only their immediate profit potential but also the longer-term implications of each flip. In an environment where suburban homes edge out urban condos, where anti-flipping taxes tighten margins, and where financing costs demand strategic foresight, house flipping is no longer the rapid-fire, high-stakes game it once was. It is, instead, a more cautious, deliberate dance—a recalibration that recognizes the shifting tides of Toronto’s real estate market in October 2024.

– Kai T.

Private Lending: Fiera’s $5.5 Billion Gamble in Canada’s Real Estate Market

/0 Comments/in /by

In a world increasingly dictated by financial constraints and shifting markets, Fiera Real Estate Investments has taken a decisive step, opening up their $5.5 billion Canadian Real Estate Debt Fund to external investors. This bold move taps into the simmering demand for non-bank financing in Canada’s real estate sector. As traditional banks tighten their lending criteria, especially after recent tumultuous interest rate fluctuations, developers and landowners are turning to private and institutional lenders with an increasing sense of urgency.

It’s almost an inevitability—when banks falter, private lending rises like a phoenix. And as we see, Fiera, under the helm of its Real Estate Debt Division head Martin Saulnier, is capitalizing on this very trend. Since its inception in 2006, Fiera’s real estate fund has already deployed over $5.5 billion in loans, proving that private lending has carved out an undeniable niche in the sector. And now, with an additional target to raise $1.5 billion, it seems poised to make waves across the urban centers of Canada.

But let’s not take the numbers at face value; what’s happening beneath the surface is of greater significance. As banks become more conservative—almost stingy, one might say—by tightening lending criteria, developers are finding themselves stranded without access to the traditional financing methods that once fuelled their projects. It’s here that Fiera’s offering becomes not just an alternative but a necessity.

What sets this fund apart from others in the real estate landscape? Well, for one, its flexibility. Fiera offers a range of financing options tailored specifically to developers’ needs—first- and second-lien loans from $5 million to $50 million with terms ranging between 12 and 24 months. And these loans? They’re backed by high-quality assets in Canada’s major urban markets, areas that desperately need redevelopment but where financing can be frustratingly elusive.

But is private lending merely filling a temporary gap, or does it signal a larger shift in how we finance our cities? Fiera seems to bet on the latter, with Pierre Pelletier, Fiera’s Senior Managing Director, boasting of stable, risk-adjusted returns. Their investors—private and institutional—can enjoy returns with low correlation to the volatile stock market, a point Saulnier emphasized as key to the fund’s future success. In essence, Fiera is offering certainty in a world increasingly defined by uncertainty.

Here, I have to pause. It’s no secret that Canada’s real estate market has been anything but predictable in the past decade. We’ve seen skyrocketing prices, followed by concerns of affordability and supply shortages—particularly in the housing market. Let’s consider this: while construction costs may have stabilized, the shortage of housing is glaring. There is simply not enough residential or industrial space to meet the current demand, and this shortage isn’t something that can be fixed with a few interest rate cuts.

One might think that housing affordability issues are on the minds of Fiera’s fund managers. However, the focus of this particular fund is not necessarily about affordable housing for low-income families—though that is undoubtedly a national concern. Instead, the focus is on financing short-term development projects that can generate quick returns for investors. Yes, these loans fuel development, but whether or not this ultimately translates into affordable housing for the average Canadian family is another story.

Yet, Fiera is not completely detached from the larger socioeconomic context. They are smartly positioning themselves to meet the increasing demand for financing non-bank loans, particularly in major urban centers like Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal. These cities are grappling with housing shortages while seeing some of the highest construction and redevelopment needs. Fiera’s fund is a calculated gamble that the private lending sector will continue to rise in response to this demand. With traditional bank loans becoming harder to come by, developers are left with few choices, and Fiera is ready to seize the opportunity.

Now, why should you care about this? Perhaps because we’re witnessing a microcosm of a larger trend, not just in Canada but globally, where private lending is stepping in where traditional institutions have hesitated. It’s an evolution in how we finance real estate—and one that has significant implications. Does this shift away from banks signify the beginning of a new norm in real estate financing? And if so, what happens when a large portion of our urban development is funded privately rather than through government-backed financial channels?

As someone involved in real estate, I can’t help but think: What does this mean for the average homebuyer? While institutional investors celebrate risk-adjusted returns, it remains to be seen how these developments will affect the broader housing market, particularly in an already strained environment where affordability is becoming a myth for many. Will these private lenders step in to fill the gap in housing supply, or will their involvement merely increase the pace of gentrification and drive prices higher?

Private lending has always been there, lurking in the background of Canada’s real estate market. But now, it’s stepping into the limelight, with Fiera leading the charge. This fund, poised to raise billions more, is not just a reflection of where the market is today but a sign of where it might be headed tomorrow.

– Kai T.

The Rising Cost of Change: How Pandemic-Era Renovations Fueled Toronto’s Housing Boom

/0 Comments/in /by

In a city already notorious for its unforgiving real estate market, few would have predicted that the quiet, dust-covered work of renovations and teardowns could be the catalyst for Toronto’s latest surge in home prices. And yet, as the report from Re/Max Canada reveals, billions funneled into home upgrades during the pandemic didn’t just tweak aesthetics—they transformed the entire market.

Consider the humble wartime bungalow, once a modest feature of Toronto’s residential landscape, now the prime target for demolition. On these parcels of land, grand custom homes sprout in their place, bringing with them not just bricks and mortar, but a gentrification wave that alters both the physical and financial landscape. The Re/Max report identifies this movement as a key driver behind the astounding 35 per cent rise in the price of detached homes from December 2019 to December 2023, with the average price soaring from $1.05 million to $1.4 million. Toronto, like Vancouver, has seen a transformation that cuts deeper than mere supply and demand.

The statistics paint a stark picture. From 2019 to 2023, renovation spending alone in Canada surged by nearly $300 billion—an 8 per cent jump from the previous period. These renovations weren’t just about new kitchen counters or fresh coats of paint. They involved extensive alterations, equipment upgrades, and additions, each one subtly contributing to the larger inflation of housing values. As the Re/Max report succinctly put it, “renovation and infill activity is raising the average price of homes one property at a time.”

This revitalization, though hardly a front-page topic, has done something remarkable: it’s redefined entire neighbourhoods. Once quaint stretches of homes in places like East York and Riverdale are now evolving into enclaves of wealth and exclusivity. The metamorphosis is unmistakable as builders and homeowners seek to maximize scarce land, driving up square footage, density, and inevitably, prices.

Look closer, though, and you’ll find another layer to this narrative. The pandemic didn’t just change the way people viewed their homes—it changed how they used them. The report flags an increasing trend of turning single-family homes into multiplexes. Faced with multi-generational living arrangements or the need for supplementary rental income, homeowners are transforming what were once traditional homes into revenue-generating properties. In a market this tight, such adaptations are often born out of necessity. As detached homes grow rarer, these new builds, with their distinct and sharper lines, quietly ripple across the housing market.

In contrast, as single-family homes get taller and sleeker, the city’s focus shifts ever more towards high-density developments. While residential building permits for single-family dwellings in Toronto and Vancouver have dropped by nearly 24 per cent between 2019 and 2023, permits for multi-family dwellings have shot up by 60 per cent in the same period. The trend is clear: the future of Toronto real estate lies in the skies, as developers seek to stretch every square inch of land to its limit.

Yet amidst all this transformation, one thing remains unchanged—scarcity. Toronto’s housing landscape is becoming increasingly defined by its lack of available land. Re/Max Canada’s president, Christopher Alexander, astutely points out that single-detached homes are now “quickly becoming a unicorn.” The once-ubiquitous Toronto dream of owning a standalone home with a backyard is rapidly slipping into a bygone era. And as demand intensifies, those already holding property cards will renovate, build, and ultimately, drive the market even higher.

With approximately 30 per cent of GTA’s housing stock built before 1960, the city’s housing fabric is undergoing a monumental shift. Infill and renovation aren’t temporary trends—they are the future. The places once called home by first-time buyers, young families, and retirees alike, are now playgrounds for investors, developers, and those looking to capitalize on rising values.

But as these new custom builds rise from the ashes of wartime bungalows, they bring with them new shops, restaurants, and commercial interests, further stimulating the value of neighbourhoods. Tim Syrianos, principal broker at Re/Max Ultimate Realty, points out the knock-on effect of these developments: “With enhanced property values come new commercial ventures, as shops and amenities emerge to cater to the wealthier residents moving in.” The invisible hand of the market isn’t so invisible after all.

The transformation of neighbourhoods like Trinity-Bellwoods, Parkdale, and Leslieville has only just begun. The urban core, once a bastion of affordability and community, is being polished, made denser, and rendered unaffordable to all but the most prosperous. The question is: how long will it last?

In a city where land is at a premium, and the detached home is becoming a rarity, the renovation boom isn’t merely cosmetic. It’s a tectonic shift, altering the very DNA of Toronto’s housing market. And as with any transformation of this scale, the consequences—both intended and unintended—are likely to reverberate for decades to come.

-Kai T.

Subscribe

Get our latest news, tips and tricks

About | Contact | Privacy Policy

© 2024 KaiByDesign