What If AI Is Making You Dumber?

Here’s an uncomfortable question: What if the tool that’s supposed to make you more productive is actually eroding the very skills that made you good at your job in the first place?

I know, I know. That sounds like the kind of technophobic nonsense your uncle posts on Facebook. But bear with me, because the neuroscience tells a story that most AI evangelists don’t want you to hear.

I caught myself last week doing something I’d never noticed before: I was reaching for my phone to solve a simple decision I already knew how to handle. I had an idea. I knew the approach. But some instinct made me think, What if AI has a better solution?

And here’s the thing—sometimes it did. Sometimes it just rephrased what I was already thinking, but more eloquently. Unless you’re a professional writer with a distinctive voice that’s hard to replicate, AI genuinely does produce cleaner prose with faster throughput than most of us typing away.

So what’s the problem?

The problem isn’t that AI writes better. It’s that I’d stopped trusting my own thinking enough to even try first.

And I’m not alone. If you’re a knowledge worker right now, you’re probably feeling it too—that creeping sense that AI is both saving you time and somehow… stealing something from you. Your attention. Your creativity. Maybe even your ability to think deeply about complex problems.

The promise was simple: AI would handle the boring stuff so we could focus on the meaningful work. But here’s what nobody told you: your brain doesn’t distinguish between “boring work” and “meaningful work” the way you think it does. And by outsourcing the boring stuff, you might be outsourcing your ability to do the meaningful stuff too.

Let me show you what I mean.


Act 1: The Dopamine Trap—Why AI Feels So Good (And Why That’s a Problem)

You know that feeling when you’re working on something hard, and you just… can’t quite figure it out? So you click over to social media. Just for a second. Just to clear your head.

Except it’s never just a second, is it?

Here’s what’s happening in your brain: Social media platforms have essentially “druggified” human connection through dopamine-driven reward mechanisms.[1] They use the same psychological tricks as slot machines—variable reinforcement schedules that create habit-forming behavior.[2] Every scroll gives you a tiny hit of dopamine, building tolerance over time and requiring more stimulation to get the same effect.[3]

And here’s the kicker: AI tools work the same way.

When you’re stuck on a problem, clicking over to ChatGPT or Claude gives you that same dopamine hit. You type in your half-formed thought, hit enter, and boom—instant gratification. An answer. A solution. Relief from the discomfort of not knowing.

Each click-refine-click cycle provides a dopamine reward, creating a continuous feedback loop.[4] This mirrors the reward uncertainty that makes gambling addictive. The emotional reinforcement precedes logical evaluation, hijacking your decision-making.[5]

fMRI studies show that problematic social media use activates the same brain regions as substance addiction—specifically the ventral striatum and nucleus accumbens.[6] Your brain literally can’t tell the difference between checking Instagram and doing cocaine. Well, almost.

But here’s where AI gets more insidious than social media: At least with social media, you know you’re procrastinating. With AI, you convince yourself you’re being productive. You’re “working smarter, not harder.” You’re “leveraging tools.” You’re “optimizing your workflow.”

What you’re actually doing is training your brain to avoid the discomfort of deep thinking.

Here’s what I’ve discovered through trial and error: AI-assisted work versus doing something manually produces dramatically different results in retention and understanding. But—and this is critical—it depends entirely on how you prompt it.

When I use careful prompt engineering—where I gather contextual information first, decide what specific points need to be outlined rather than randomly generated, and get AI to show me its thinking process through an outline before drafting—the accuracy, intent, and throughput massively increases compared to thinking from scratch.

The key distinction: AI doing the heavy lifting while you direct it, versus AI directing you when it feels like it.

This isn’t about AI being bad. It’s about most people using it thoughtlessly. They treat it like a magic box that spits out answers. What they should be treating it like is a research assistant that needs clear direction about what you’re trying to accomplish.


Act 2: The Creativity Crisis—What Happens When Your Brain Never Gets Bored

Let’s talk about something you probably never thought you’d hear: You need to be more bored.

I know how that sounds in 2025, when productivity gurus are telling you to optimize every minute of your day. But hear me out, because the neuroscience is pretty clear on this.

Boredom isn’t a bug in your brain—it’s a feature. It’s actually a signal that your brain needs stimulation of a different kind.[7] When you let yourself be bored, your brain activates something called the Default Mode Network (DMN), which is crucial for creativity and problem-solving.[8]

The DMN is like your brain’s background processing system. It integrates spontaneous neural activity with learned knowledge, producing novel, meaningful insights.[9] This is where your best ideas come from—not from frantically consuming content, but from letting your mind wander.

Creativity emerges from slow, spontaneous fluctuations in resting-state brain activity.[9] Boredom increases cognitive flexibility by allowing your mind to explore alternative perspectives.[10] Novelty-seeking, which is driven by boredom, is the foundation of both creativity and curiosity.[11]

But when was the last time you let yourself be truly bored?

I’m guessing it’s been a while. Because the moment you feel that little twinge of boredom—waiting in line, sitting in a waiting room, having a slow moment at work—you reach for your phone. And increasingly, you reach for an AI tool.

Need to write something? AI. Need to research something? AI. Need to brainstorm? AI.

You’re never giving your Default Mode Network a chance to do its job.

Recent neuroscience research confirms that spontaneous, off-task thought is essential for mental health and problem-solving.[12] Mind-wandering and intentional boredom allow the hippocampus to consolidate memories and replay experiences for learning.[13]

I’ve noticed something interesting: my best insights come during activities that require complete attention but no screen. Running. Walking. Any task that pulls you away from direct computer engagement.

Why? Because it’s harder to mindlessly scroll social media when you need to focus on not tripping over a curb. This type of insight feels more creatively raw—less processed, more genuine.

Now, to be fair, you can still get inspiration by throwing random ideas into ChatGPT. But it’s hit or miss if you’re trying to capture a specific feel. Without proper prompt engineering, you’re getting general AI slop. On the positive side, AI has completely shattered writer’s block when used constructively—giving you that initial momentum to overcome the blank page.

But AI is stealing those moments from you. Every time you reach for a tool to fill that cognitive gap, you’re robbing your brain of the space it needs to make those connections on its own.


Act 3: The Outsourcing Spiral—The Hidden Cost of Convenience

Let’s get real for a second: AI is exhausting you in ways you probably don’t even recognize.

You thought AI was supposed to reduce your cognitive load, right? Just hand off the boring stuff and focus on the strategic thinking. Except that’s not what’s happening.

Here’s what’s actually happening: AI usage creates what researchers call “cognitive offloading,” which leads to skill erosion when overused.[14] People become willing to offload cognitive tasks to AI when they’re under high cognitive load, but this creates a dependency.[15]

And here’s the paradox: The more you use AI to reduce cognitive load, the more cognitively loaded you become.

Why? Because now you have to evaluate AI outputs, which requires understanding something you didn’t actually create. Researchers call this the “efficiency-accountability tradeoff”—prioritizing AI efficiency erodes human comprehension and creates over-reliance.[16]

Think about it: How many times have you asked AI to write something, then spent twenty minutes editing it, trying to figure out if it’s actually saying what you want it to say? You’re not saving time—you’re just shifting the cognitive burden from creation to evaluation. And evaluation without comprehension is exhausting.

Studies show that AI anxiety and attitudes toward AI significantly increase decision fatigue in daily technology use.[17]Cognitive load actually increases when AI provides answers without explanation, because you still have to evaluate outputs without understanding them.[18]

The research has a term for this: “burned out by technology.” It’s the overwhelming psychological and physiological fatigue from constant tech engagement.[19]

Here’s where it gets interesting: I’ve noticed AI can be both energizing and exhausting, depending on how you engage with it.

When I’m overly engrossed in AI-assisted research, I tend to go in learning a ton and leave with more questions. This creates a perpetual feedback loop that some might call obsessive—though I’d argue it’s more like passionate curiosity. Your mileage may vary.

In the early days of ChatGPT, when it wasn’t as polished, getting a bespoke response without high-level prompt engineering was genuinely frustrating. Notice the theme here: AI directed with human thinking versus AI used thoughtlessly without thinking.

For me personally, AI is mostly energizing. But I’ve learned to recognize when taking a break is the right call. The exhaustion comes not from using AI, but from using it badly—letting it drive when you should be steering.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: When you offload thinking to AI, you often don’t understand the outputs you’re using. You become a pass-through device. Research confirms that people willing to use AI with minimal evaluation create outputs they cannot explain or defend.

This creates skill atrophy. The cognitive muscles needed for original thought weaken from disuse.[14]

And the scariest part? You don’t notice it happening. It’s not like you wake up one day and can’t think anymore. It’s gradual. Insidious. You just start reaching for AI a little more often. Trusting your own thinking a little less.


Act 4: The Mental Bandwidth Tax—Why You Can’t Think Anymore

Let’s talk about something you’ve probably noticed but couldn’t quite name: your attention is fragmented. Like, reallyfragmented.

You sit down to work on something important, and within minutes, you’ve:

  • Checked Slack
  • Glanced at your email
  • Opened ChatGPT “just to see if AI could help”
  • Clicked over to Twitter to “clear your head”
  • Come back to your work, lost your train of thought, and started the cycle again

Sound familiar?

Digital overwhelm leads to attention fragmentation and degraded social interaction.[1] Constant digital engagement creates mental distraction, reducing your capacity for deep work.[20]

You’re not just distracted—you’re paying what I call a mental bandwidth tax. Every app you have open, every notification you haven’t cleared, every AI tool running in the background—they’re all taking up mental real estate. Your brain is running too many background processes, and it’s slowing down your primary processor.

Here’s what’s wild: The solution has been staring us in the face the whole time, but we’ve been too busy optimizing our tools to notice.

Research on digital detox is unambiguous: Deliberate digital withdrawal enhances “eudaimonic well-being”—that’s a fancy term for purposeful living and personal growth.[21] Digital detox improves attention, reduces stress, and enhances self-reflection.[21]

But it’s not just about unplugging. It’s about recognizing that your brain needs rest breaks to function optimally. Restoration of attention through rest breaks significantly improves performance in multitasking environments.[22]

I practice something simple but powerful: I don’t check my phone first thing in the morning until I’m fully up and awake, and until I’ve completed most of my morning routines.

The impact has been significant. I feel more present and intentional with how I spend personal time in the morning. The research backs this up—exposure to digital stimuli first thing in the morning induces stress that may not be beneficial right out of the gate.

This isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about being deliberate with when you let it into your headspace. The morning is when your mind is freshest, most creative, least cluttered. Why would you immediately fill it with other people’s priorities, notifications, and algorithmic feeds?


Act 5: The Solution—The Radical Act of Using Your Hands

Okay, here’s where I’m going to lose some of you. But stick with me, because this is where the science gets really interesting.

Ready? Start writing things by hand.

I know, I know. It sounds absurdly low-tech. Practically Luddite. But the neuroscience is overwhelming on this point, and it reveals something profound about how we think.

Handwriting activates widespread brain connectivity across sensory, motor, and cognitive regions.[23] The motor component of handwriting creates stronger memory encoding than typing.[24] Students who take handwritten notes perform better on conceptual questions than laptop note-takers.[25]

But it’s not just about memory. It’s about thinking.

When you type, your fingers are mostly on autopilot. You’re transcribing thoughts that already exist in your head. But when you write by hand, something different happens. The slower pace forces you to think more carefully about what you’re writing. You can’t copy-paste. You can’t let AI finish your sentences. You have to think through each word, each phrase, each idea.

I use a hybrid approach to drafting that’s evolved with how I work: I use what’s on hand at the time.

I used to carry my laptop everywhere. That’s simply not feasible anymore. Now I carry a pocket notebook wherever I go, using writing to capture notes and ideas on the fly. If I’m pressed for time, I’ll do an audio recording and then engage AI processes to transcribe and organize my thinking.

The key insight: different tools for different moments and different types of thinking.

Here’s my philosophy on this: There’s a time and place for both approaches. Use the best tools available to you in the given moment.

Why? Because inaction has an expensive penalty. Speed is almost always favorable over the need to solely depend on either analog or digital methods. That said, I’ve found that for certain applications, one method clearly outperforms the other.

The key is recognizing which is which—and not defaulting to AI just because it’s faster, or avoiding it out of principle when it would genuinely accelerate your work without compromising your thinking.

This is the real solution to the AI overwhelm problem: Not rejecting AI entirely, but being intentional about when you use your own cognitive muscles and when you reach for tools.

Think of it like physical fitness. You wouldn’t use an elevator for every single flight of stairs and expect to stay in shape. Your muscles need resistance to stay strong. Your brain is no different.

When you always reach for AI, you’re using the cognitive elevator. And just like your body gets weaker when you never take the stairs, your thinking gets weaker when you never engage in the hard work of figuring things out yourself.


So What Do You Actually Do?

Look, I’m not suggesting you throw your laptop in a lake and become a monk. AI is powerful, and it’s not going anywhere.

But here’s what I am suggesting:

Create friction points. Before you reach for AI, ask yourself: “Am I using this because I genuinely need help, or because I’m avoiding the discomfort of thinking?”

Protect your boredom. Schedule time for “analog thinking”—walks, showers, drives—where you’re not consuming anything. Just letting your mind wander.

Use your hands. Draft important thinking by hand first. Let AI help with execution, but not with thinking.

Notice the pattern. Pay attention to when AI actually helps versus when it just makes you feel productive while making you dumber.

Reclaim your mental bandwidth. You can’t think deeply when you’re juggling seventeen browser tabs and three AI tools. Close some tabs. Create space.

The uncomfortable truth is this: AI is only as good as the thinking you bring to it. If you outsource all your thinking to AI, you’ll eventually have nothing left to bring.

The goal isn’t to become anti-technology. It’s to become pro-thinking. To recognize that the most valuable thing you have to offer as a knowledge worker isn’t your ability to produce more content faster—it’s your ability to think clearly about complex problems.

And you can’t do that if you’re always reaching for tools to do the thinking for you.

So here’s my challenge to you: Pick one task today—just one—and do it the hard way. No AI. No tools. Just you and the problem.

You might be surprised by what your brain can do when you actually let it work.

– Kai T.


Research Citations

This article draws on peer-reviewed neuroscience, psychology, and behavioral research across multiple domains. Key studies include:

Dopamine & Digital Addiction:

Boredom & Creativity:

Cognitive Load & AI Dependency:

Digital Minimalism:

Handwriting & Memory:

Why Your Fear of Failure Is Actually Your GPS to Success

Picture this: You’re staring at your laptop screen, cursor blinking mockingly in an empty document. You have an idea that could change everything—a business, a book, a creative project. But instead of typing, you’re frozen, imagining all the ways it could go wrong. Sound familiar?

If you’ve ever let fear talk you out of pursuing something meaningful, you’re not alone. But what if I told you that the very fear holding you back is actually pointing you toward your greatest opportunities?

The Truth About Who’s Actually Watching You Fail

Here’s a reality check that might sting a little: most people aren’t paying as much attention to your potential failures as you think they are. We’re all living in what psychologists call “our own world of Me, Inc.”—where we’re the main character in our personal drama.

The people who truly matter won’t judge your attempts. And those who do judge? They’re usually too busy dealing with their own fears to matter in your success story.

Consider this perspective shift: a successful entrepreneur who built a $100 million business credits his success to one simple decision—not listening to fear. While others were paralyzed by “what if,” he was busy testing, failing, and learning.

The Cheerleader Principle: What You Give Is What You Get

Here’s a counterintuitive strategy that transforms how others perceive your efforts: become a cheerleader for others’ work.

When you actively praise and support others’ attempts—whether they succeed or fail—you create a positive environment that comes back to you. More importantly, you rewire your own mindset away from criticism and toward encouragement.

There’s psychological truth here: you fear judgment of the things you judge. If you’re constantly critiquing others’ work, you’ll naturally expect the same treatment. But when you become someone who celebrates effort and progress, you assume others will do the same for you.

Think of it as social karma—the energy you put out regarding others’ attempts directly influences how you approach your own.

Why Winners Actually Lose More Than Everyone Else

This might sound backwards, but here’s the math of success: winners lose more than losers ever will.

Why? Because they keep playing the game. They understand that failure isn’t the opposite of success—it’s a prerequisite for it.

Consider these examples:

  • Walt Disney faced bankruptcy before creating his empire
  • Henry Ford’s first companies failed before he revolutionized the auto industry
  • Most millionaires had at least one failed company before finding their breakthrough

Failure is like a muscle—the more you train it, the stronger you get. Each setback teaches you what to look for next time, builds your resilience, and proves to yourself that you can get back up.

The only way you truly lose is if you decide to stop playing the game entirely.

The Action-Over-Perfection Formula

Here’s where most people get stuck: they wait for the perfect plan, the perfect moment, the perfect circumstances. Meanwhile, successful people are busy implementing imperfect plans and learning from real-world feedback.

The faster you move from idea to action—even if you get a “no” or experience a setback—the more quickly you develop the skills and resilience that lead to breakthrough success.

This means:

  • Assume you’re wrong from the start (it takes the pressure off being perfect)
  • Prioritize self-belief over waiting for external validation
  • Bet on your ability to figure things out as you go

Real entrepreneurs don’t wait for certainty—they create it through action.

Your Imagination: Disaster Generator or Success Amplifier?

Here’s a profound realization: worry is a wasted use of your imagination.

If you can vividly picture worst-case scenarios (and most of us are experts at this), you possess the exact same mental power to visualize and manifest best-case outcomes.

Think of it like skiing: if you stare at the trees you want to avoid, you’ll likely hit them. But if you focus on the open spaces and sunlight—where you want to go—you’ll naturally navigate toward success.

Your reality becomes the byproduct of your most dominant thoughts, actions, and feelings. So the question becomes: are you using your imagination to rehearse success or disaster?

The F.E.A.R. Revelation

Fear often stands for False Evidence Appearing Real. It feels completely legitimate in the moment, but most of our fears never materialize the way we imagine them.

Instead of asking “What if I fail?” try asking “What if I succeed?

Instead of “Why me?” ask “Why not me?

Whether you want to write a book, start a business, create content, or pursue any meaningful goal—success is available to those who want it badly enough to push through the initial discomfort.

The Visualization Technique That Changes Everything

Here’s a practical tool for rewiring your fear response: use Coach Ed Mylett’s camera lens technique.

Immerse yourself completely in your desired future. Imagine it in vivid detail—forward, backward, black and white to full color. Be able to describe the minute details of having already achieved what you want.

This isn’t wishful thinking—it’s mental rehearsal. Athletes use this technique to improve performance, and you can use it to build the confidence needed for bold action.

Your Next Move

Fear will always be part of pursuing meaningful goals. The difference between those who succeed and those who don’t isn’t the absence of fear—it’s the willingness to act despite it.

Remember: the only time you lose the game is if you decide to stop playing.

Your fears are often pointing you toward your biggest opportunities. The thing you’re most afraid to try might be exactly what you need to pursue.

The question isn’t whether you’ll face setbacks—you will. The question is whether you’ll use them as stepping stones or stopping points.

Ready to transform your relationship with failure and unlock your potential? Subscribe for more insights on turning fear into fuel and obstacles into opportunities. Because the world needs what you have to offer—and deep down, you know it too.

– Kai T.

From People Pleaser to Straight Shooter: Finding Balance in Professional Communication

Being likable at work is great until it isn’t. I learned this lesson the hard way through years of diplomatic emails, cautious conversations, and meetings that left everyone smiling but confused. As someone in a people-centric role, I mastered the art of being approachable – but at what cost?

The Diplomatic Trap

Here’s a scene that might feel familiar: You’re in a meeting, and someone proposes a timeline that you know is impossible. Instead of saying “That’s not feasible,” you hear yourself saying, “That’s an interesting timeline, we might need to explore some alternatives…” Twenty minutes of gentle back-and-forth later, nobody’s quite sure if you’ve agreed to the deadline or not.

Sound familiar? You’re not alone.

The truth is, many of us fall into the diplomatic trap, especially in roles where relationships are currency. We become masters of the soft no, experts at the gentle deflection, and champions of the maybe-later response. We think we’re being professional and maintaining harmony, but we’re actually creating three significant problems:

  1. Unclear Expectations: When we cushion our messages in layers of politeness, the core point gets lost
  2. Time Waste: Both in lengthy, vague conversations and in fixing misunderstandings later
  3. Reduced Trust: Ironically, being indirect can make people trust us less in the long run

The Cost of Being “Nice”

Being diplomatic isn’t inherently bad – until it prevents clear communication. Here are some real costs I’ve encountered:

  • Projects derailing because I didn’t firmly say “no” to scope creep
  • Team members feeling let down because they interpreted my “maybe” as a “yes”
  • Hours spent in clarifying emails that could have been avoided with one direct conversation
  • Stress from managing multiple misaligned expectations

The Path to Direct Communication

The good news? Being direct doesn’t mean being harsh. It’s about finding the sweet spot between maintaining relationships and being clear. Here’s how to start:

1. Recognize Your Patterns

Common diplomatic phrases that need retiring:

  • “I’ll try my best” (when you know it’s not possible)
  • “Let me see what I can do” (when you already know what you can do)
  • “Maybe we could…” (when you mean “We should” or “We shouldn’t”)

2. Reframe Direct Communication

Direct ≠ Rude
Direct = Clear + Respectful

3. Start with Low-Stakes Situations

Practice being direct in safer contexts:

  • Setting meeting durations
  • Confirming deadlines
  • Clarifying task requirements

4. Use the Direct Response Formula

  1. Acknowledge the request
  2. Give your clear position
  3. Provide brief context if needed
  4. State next steps

Example:
Instead of: “I’ll try to look into that timeline and see what we can do…”
Try: “I’ve reviewed the timeline. We can’t meet the June deadline with our current resources. We can deliver by August 15th, or we can reduce the scope to meet the June date. Which would you prefer?”

Context Matters: Adjusting Your Direct Style

Being direct doesn’t mean using the same tone in every situation. Here’s how to adapt while maintaining clarity:

With Senior Leadership

❌ “That’s not possible.”
✅ “Based on our current resources, this approach would put Project X at risk. I recommend we [alternative].”

With Peers

❌ “I can’t help.”
✅ “I’m at capacity with Project X through June. I can connect you with Sarah who has expertise in this area.”

With Direct Reports

❌ “This isn’t good enough.”
✅ “This report needs specific changes: [list]. Please submit the revision by Friday.”

Making the Transition

Remember, this is a journey. You won’t transform overnight, and that’s okay. Start with these steps:

  1. Audit Your Communication: Review your emails and meeting notes. Highlight diplomatic phrases that could be clearer.
  2. Practice Pause-and-Respond: Before automatically falling into diplomatic speech, pause. Ask yourself: “What’s the clearest way to say this?”
  3. Set Clear Boundaries: Start meetings with objectives and end times. State your capacity before taking on new work.
  4. Follow Up in Writing: After important conversations, send clear summary emails: “As discussed, I will X by Y date. You will provide Z by…”

The Unexpected Benefits

Since working on being more direct, I’ve noticed:

  • Shorter, more productive meetings
  • Increased respect from colleagues
  • Less anxiety about unclear expectations
  • More time for actual work instead of clarifying communications
  • Stronger, more authentic professional relationships

Final Thoughts

Being direct doesn’t mean losing your approachability or emotional intelligence. In fact, clear communication often makes you more trustworthy and reliable in others’ eyes. The key is to remember that you’re not choosing between being nice and being clear – you’re choosing to be clearly nice.

Your relationships won’t suffer from direct communication; they’ll suffer from the misunderstandings, missed expectations, and hidden resentments that come from being too diplomatic. The kindest thing you can often do is be clear.

Are you ready to become a straight shooter? Start small, be patient with yourself, and remember: every clear “no” makes room for a more authentic “yes.”


What communication patterns do you struggle with? Share your experiences in the comments below, and let’s learn from each other’s journeys toward clearer communication.

– Kai T.